Congress splits on war powers resolutions to force Trump to abandon Iran war

• Senate rejected the binding joint resolution 47-49, with only one Republican (Sen. Collins) voting for it and one Democrat (Sen. Fetterman) voting against it
• House passed a non-binding concurrent resolution 214-208 that expresses congressional disapproval but would not reach Trump's desk for signature
• Oil prices surged with Brent crude topping $100 and U.S. gas prices hitting $4.09 per gallon average, threatening Republican electoral prospects in the midterms

Summary

Congress remains divided on war powers resolutions aimed at forcing President Trump to withdraw from an escalating conflict with Iran. On Thursday, the Senate voted 47-49 to reject a joint resolution under the War Powers Act that would have compelled an end to hostilities. The House passed a concurrent resolution 214-208, though this measure expresses congressional disapproval without requiring presidential signature.

The votes follow Trump's notification to Congress that he restarted the Iran war after failed peace negotiations, ending a fragile ceasefire. The conflict's timing threatens Republican control of narrow congressional majorities ahead of midterm elections.

Market Impact: Oil prices surged significantly, with Brent crude topping $100 per barrel and domestic crude exceeding $91. U.S. gas prices have climbed to $4.09 per gallon, raising cost-of-living concerns for voters.

Political Dynamics: Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), facing a competitive race in a blue state, crossed party lines to support withdrawal. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) was the sole Democrat opposing the measure. Republicans argue that forcing withdrawal would damage American credibility and tie the administration's hands militarily.

Even if Congress passed binding legislation, Trump would likely veto it. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) urged Congress to "take responsibility" for ending what he called a "bad war." However, Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) downplayed voter concerns about the conflict, suggesting the election will focus on cost-of-living issues.

The escalating conflict poses significant risks to energy markets and the broader economy as oil price volatility intensifies.