Rave Sues Apple for Antitrust Over Video App Removal

• Rave's app, which allows users to watch and discuss video content together across multiple platforms, remains available on Android and Windows but was removed from Apple's App Store for alleged 'dishonest or fraudulent activity'
• The lawsuit alleges Apple's removal was pretextual, targeting Rave because it relied on advertising revenue rather than in-app purchases that would generate commission fees for Apple
• This case adds to Apple's ongoing antitrust challenges, including its long-running dispute with Epic Games over App Store commission practices that recently returned to federal court after Supreme Court review

Summary: Rave Sues Apple for Antitrust Over Video App Removal

Key Development:

Ontario-based software developer Rave filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple on May 7 in U.S. federal court in New Jersey, alleging anticompetitive practices related to its app removal from the App Store.

Core Allegations:

Rave claims Apple removed its video co-viewing app in 2025 under the pretense of "dishonest or fraudulent activity." However, Rave alleges the real motive was anticompetitive: the app competed with Apple's similar product, SharePlay, while generating minimal revenue for Apple through in-app purchases since it relied primarily on advertising revenue.

Company Background:

Founded in 2013, Rave operates a cross-platform app enabling users to watch and discuss video content together across iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac. The app remains available on Android and Windows platforms.

Financial Claims:

Rave demands reinstatement to the App Store and "hundreds of millions of dollars" in damages. CEO Michael Pazaratz stated the removal harmed consumers by limiting choice and preventing Apple customers from connecting with non-Apple users, disrupting communities built on the platform.

Market Context:

This lawsuit adds to Apple's ongoing antitrust challenges. The company has been embroiled in a dispute with Epic Games since 2020 over in-app purchase commissions, which resulted in significant business model changes. The U.S. Supreme Court recently sent that case back to federal court in California.

Response:

Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit.

The case highlights continued regulatory scrutiny of Apple's App Store practices and its competitive conduct regarding in-house products versus third-party applications.