Trump Says He Is “Ashamed” Of Supreme Court Majority That Struck Down His Tariffs; POTUS Vows “Other Alternatives”

• The ruling invalidated the centerpiece of Trump's economic agenda, with the court determining he exceeded his emergency powers authority
• Trump pledged to maintain national security tariffs and seek alternative routes, citing Justice Brett Kavanaugh's dissent and potential Congressional authorization
• Replicating the tariff scope through Congress or other trade legislation appears highly unlikely and would face additional legal challenges

Summary: Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs

Key Development: On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping international trade tariffs, ruling that he lacked authority under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to unilaterally impose the levies.

Presidential Response: In a White House briefing with dimmed lighting, Trump called the ruling "deeply disappointing" and said he was "absolutely ashamed" of the court majority for lacking "the courage to do what's right for our country." The president vowed to pursue "other alternatives" to maintain his tariff agenda.

Legal Strategy: Trump indicated he would explore other avenues for imposing tariffs, referencing options cited by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of three dissenters. While acknowledging it would be "a little bit longer process," the president claimed he could seek Congressional authority or use other trade legislation. He emphasized that all national security tariffs "will remain in place."

Market Implications: The ruling represents a significant blow to the centerpiece of Trump's economic agenda. However, the likelihood of replicating the original tariff scope through Congressional action appears limited, and any new implementation attempts face probable legal challenges.

Outlook: The decision creates uncertainty around U.S. trade policy and could impact international trade relations, supply chains, and markets that had adjusted to Trump's tariff regime. The president's determination to pursue alternative paths suggests continued volatility in trade policy, though the practical implementation timeline remains unclear.